Federal International Banking Company v. Touche
Federal International Banking Company v. Touche
162 N.E. 507; 248 N.Y. 517; 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1309
(North Eastern Reporter)
Federal International Banking Company v. Touche
Opinion of the Court
In each action order affirmed, with costs; question certified answered in the negative. Held, that section 50, subdivision 1, of the Civil Practice Act, in so far as it prescribes a limitation in actions to recover damages for malpractice, refers to actions to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from the misconduct of physicians, surgeons and others practicing a profession similar to those enumerated.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.