New York Court of Appeals, 1929

Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New York

Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals · Decided July 11, 1929 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
168 N.E. 438; 251 N.Y. 589; 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 848 (North Eastern Reporter)

Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New York

Opinion of the Court

Motion for reargument or to amend remittitur. (See 250 N. Y. 495.)

Per Curiam.

The opinion should be limited as applicable to the facts appearing in the record. It was not the intention of this court to indicate its opinion as to the liability of the plaintiff to pay taxes upon the property in question or other maintenance charges. This court decided only that upon the facts disclosed in the record the plaintiff could not recover from the defendant the sums which it had paid for insurance and interest on the mortgages.

The motion for reargument or to amend the remittitur should be denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.