New York Court of Appeals, 1929

McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company

McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company
New York Court of Appeals · Decided May 28, 1929 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
168 N.E. 407; 251 N.Y. 507; 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 748 (North Eastern Reporter)

McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of McNamara v. Leipzig (227 N. Y. 291); Matter of Schweitzer v. Thompson & Norris Co. (229 N. Y. 97); Braxton v. *508 Mendelson (233 N. Y. 122); Charles v. Barrett (233 N. Y. 127); Meade v. Motor Haulage Co., Inc. (233 N. Y. 527); Cattini v. American Railway Express Co. (234 N. Y. 585); Bartolomeo v. Bennett Contracting Co.,Inc. (245 N. Y. 66).

Caedozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.