McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company
New York Court of Appeals
McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company, 168 N.E. 407 (N.Y. 1929)
251 N.Y. 507; 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 748
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of McNamara v. Leipzig (227 N. Y. 291); Matter of Schweitzer v. Thompson & Norris Co. (229 N. Y. 97); Braxton v. *508 Mendelson (233 N. Y. 122); Charles v. Barrett (233 N. Y. 127); Meade v. Motor Haulage Co., Inc. (233 N. Y. 527); Cattini v. American Railway Express Co. (234 N. Y. 585); Bartolomeo v. Bennett Contracting Co.,Inc. (245 N. Y. 66).
Caedozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, etc.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Helen McLaughlin, an Infant, by John J. McLaughlin, Her Guardian Ad Litem, Appellant, v. Audley Clarke Company, Respondent, Impleaded With Others
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published