Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /New York /Cases /New York Court of Appeals /

1929

196 New York Court of Appeals opinions from 1929.

  • Lane v. Chantilly Corporation 167 N.E. 578, (N.Y. 1929)
  • In Re the Estate of Taylor 167 N.E. 434, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Matter of Grade Crossings (City of Buffalo) 167 N.E. 460, (N.Y. 1929)
  • People v. Thompson 167 N.E. 575, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Araje v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co. 167 N.E. 497, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Hendricks v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad 251 N.Y. 297, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Byrnes v. Chase National Bank 168 N.E. 423, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Rudolph v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance 167 N.E. 223, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Murphy v. Murphy 167 N.E. 223, (N.Y. 1929)
  • In Re the Estate of Packard 168 N.E. 420, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Geitner v. United State Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 167 N.E. 222, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Goldberg v. McCord 166 N.E. 793, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Encarnacion v. Jamison 168 N.E. 418, (N.Y. 1929)
  • In Re the Accounting of Clare 166 N.E. 797, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Atlantic Fruit Co. v. Hamilton Fire Insurance 167 N.E. 184, (N.Y. 1929)
  • M.H. Metal Products Corporation v. April 167 N.E. 201, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Killian v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 166 N.E. 798, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Robins Silk Manufacturing Co. v. Consolidated Piece Dye Works 167 N.E. 181, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Cramer v. Perine 167 N.E. 213, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Claim of Dependents of Marks v. Gray 167 N.E. 181, (N.Y. 1929)
  • People Ex Rel. Gellis v. Sheriff 166 N.E. 795, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Gaita v. Windsor Bank 167 N.E. 203, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Madfes v. Beverly Development Corp. 166 N.E. 787, (N.Y. 1929)
  • McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company 168 N.E. 407, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Gerka v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 167 N.E. 169, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Claim of Wagner v. Wilson & Co. 167 N.E. 174, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Ekelman v. Marano 167 N.E. 211, (N.Y. 1929)
  • In Re the Accounting of Rosenberg 167 N.E. 190, (N.Y. 1929)
  • People Ex Rel. Hirschberg v. Board of Supervisors 167 N.E. 204, (N.Y. 1929)
  • American Surety Co. v. Conner 166 N.E. 783, (N.Y. 1929)
  • People v. Pacelli 167 N.E. 173, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Gutfreund v. East River National Bank 167 N.E. 171, (N.Y. 1929)
  • People v. Zambounis 167 N.E. 183, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Cohen v. 1165 Fulton Avenue Corp. 166 N.E. 792, (N.Y. 1929)
  • People v. Shakun 167 N.E. 187, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Suetterlein v. Northern Insurance 167 N.E. 176, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. 167 N.E. 194, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Lord & Burnham Co. v. City of New York 167 N.E. 220, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Abrams v. Thompson 167 N.E. 178, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Chatham Phenix National Bank v. Crosney 167 N.E. 217, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Deming v. Hill 166 N.E. 351, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Hudson v. Church of the Holy Trinity 166 N.E. 306, (N.Y. 1929)
  • J. E. Realty Corporation v. Dillon 166 N.E. 351, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Markert v. Feinblatt 166 N.E. 344, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Matter of Schaefer v. Buffalo Steel Car Co. 166 N.E. 183, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co. 166 N.E. 173, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Herzog v. Jean Valjean Realty Corporation 166 N.E. 341, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New York 166 N.E. 179, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Trustees of Columbia University v. Kalvin 166 N.E. 169, (N.Y. 1929)
  • Bradford Co. v. Dunn 166 N.E. 167, (N.Y. 1929)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑