Matter of Griffin v. Cruikshank Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Matter of Griffin v. Cruikshank Co., 171 N.E. 64 (N.Y. 1930)
253 N.Y. 303; 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 831
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
Matter of Griffin v. Cruikshank Co.
Opinion of the Court
Although the principal business of the employer was not a hazardous employment within the enumeration of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67, § 3), the claimant-employee was a person engaged in one of the hazardous employments so enumerated, to wit: Group 2, the Care of Buildings, and hence entitled to compensation under the provisions of section 2, subdivision 4 (Matter of Glatzl v. Stumpp, 220 N. Y. 71).
The order should be affirmed with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In the Matter of the Claim of John Griffin, Respondent, Against Cruikshank Co., Inc., Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published