People v. Arata
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Winkler (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1964)
- State v. Saba (La. 1943)
- People v. Luciano (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1937)
- People v. Morales (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Crimmins (N.Y. 1975)
- People v. Cooper (N.Y. 1954)
- People v. Durling (N.Y. 1952)
- McHugh v. Jones (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1939)
- People v. Leonti (N.Y. 1933)
- People v. Arata (N.Y. 1931)
- People v. Gordon (New York Supreme Court 1931)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The affidavits proving or tending to prove that contradictory statements were made by the witness Woodbury, while not sufficient in themselves to require a new trial, were, none the less, of such importance that the cause of justice would be promoted by causing Woodbury to be produced as a witness and subjected to the test of cross-examination.
Following the practice in People v. Shilitano (215 N. Y. 715), the determination of the appeal will be withheld until the fall session of the court to the end that an *566 opportunity may be given to the defendant to renew his motions for a new trial and an opportunity given to the trial judge to require the production of witnesses before him.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.