New York Court of Appeals, 1930

People Ex Rel. Fong v. Honeck

People Ex Rel. Fong v. Honeck
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 18, 1930
171 N.E. 771; 253 N.Y. 536; 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 901 (North Eastern Reporter)
People Ex Rel. Fong v. Honeck

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In each proceeding order of the Appellate Division reversed and those of the Special Term affirmed, without costs, on the ground that the relator has not conclusively *537 established that he was not present in the demanding State at the time of the commission of the crime (People ex rel. Gottschalk v. Brown, 237 N. Y. 483, 486; Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police, 245 U. S. 128); no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.