New York Court of Appeals, 1930

Eisenberg v. Reasenberg

Eisenberg v. Reasenberg
New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 7, 1930 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
169 N.E. 656; 252 N.Y. 490; 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 650 (North Eastern Reporter)

Eisenberg v. Reasenberg

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon this record the jury could properly find that the defendant had no information and no belief that the plaintiff had been guilty of any wrong. The privilege of transmitting information of an alleged crime to the appropriate public officers cannot apply to a communication sent under such circumstances.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.