Matter of Heimsoth

New York Court of Appeals
Matter of Heimsoth, 175 N.E. 112 (N.Y. 1931)
255 N.Y. 409; 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 694
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>

Matter of Heimsoth

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We hold that in the circumstances of this case the appellant was under an active duty to see to it that the pendency of the separation suit be brought *411 to the notice of the court upon the inquest for default of an answer in the action for annulment.

The order should be affirmed. ■

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur; Kellogg, J., not sitting.

Order affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of Joseph W. Heimsoth, an Attorney, Appellant. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Respondent
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published