Matter of Leland
Matter of Leland
175 N.E. 333; 255 N.Y. 607; 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 740
(North Eastern Reporter)
Matter of Leland
Opinion of the Court
The order should be interpreted as requiring the payment of the purchase price directly to the United States Trust Company, the substituted trustee. So interpreted the irregularities in the proceeding are formal rather than substantial.
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur; Kellogg, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.