Triangle Mint Corp. v. Mulrooney
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Seaboard New York Corp. v. Wallander (New York Supreme Court 1948)
- Kelley v. Kavanaugh (District Court, W.D. New York 1933)
- Baris Shoe Co. v. Town of Oyster Bay (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- Snap 'N' Pops, Inc. v. Dillon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1979)
- Henry Modell & Co. v. Regency-Lexington Partners (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1978)
- Toomey v. Neenan (New York Supreme Court 1969)
- Pasternack v. Block (New York Supreme Court 1962)
- Mack v. Court of General Sessions (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1961)
- Eisenberg v. Kennedy (New York Supreme Court 1957)
- Weiss v. Beckmann (New York Supreme Court 1950)
- Erickson v. Hogan (New York Supreme Court 1950)
- Reed v. Littleton (N.Y. 1937)
- Lyttle v. Valentine (New York Supreme Court 1936)
- Young v. Sunderman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1933)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
An equity court should exercise its jurisdiction to restrain the police from enforcing a criminal statute, the enforcement of which threatens property damage, only in cases where a clear legal right to that relief is established. The record in this case does not establish such a clear legal right. For that reason the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.