330 Bleecker Street Corp. v. Mutual Tile Corp.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Gateway Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Sohmer v. Gedney Hills, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1959)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
As between the appellant, Mutual Tile Company, and the New York Title and Mortgage Company rights and priorities must obviously be ascertained and settled. Since its rights and interests are or may be involved in that settlement respondent should have an opportunity to be heard in the matter. The proper forum for the determination of all these equities and priorities is in this action. (McDermott v. Lawyers Mortgage Co., 232 N. Y. 336, 349.)
The order should be reversed, with costs in all courts, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Question No. 1 is not answered. Question No. 2 is answered in the affirmative.
Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.