New York Court of Appeals, 1932

Matter of Dr. Bloom Dentist, Inc. v. Cruise

Matter of Dr. Bloom Dentist, Inc. v. Cruise
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 12, 1932
184 N.E. 97; 260 N.Y. 571; 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 766 (North Eastern Reporter)

Matter of Dr. Bloom Dentist, Inc. v. Cruise

Opinion of the Court

Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted; return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding the following: The point was . presented by respondent in his . brief on the appeal that, the order herein results in the taking of its property without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Such point was considered and decided by the Court adversely to the respondent.” (Bryant v. Zimmerman, 278 U. S. 63, on page 69.) (See 259 N. Y. 358.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.