New York Court of Appeals, 1933

Severance v. Severance

Severance v. Severance
New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 10, 1933 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
183 N.E. 909; 260 N.Y. 432; 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 775 (North Eastern Reporter)

Severance v. Severance

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The provision of the final judgment of divorce directing payments of money for the support of the plaintiff ” (Civ. Pr. Act, § 1159) should be stricken out, the plaintiff having remarried, but without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to seek relief under the provisions of the contract of December 12,1925. We express no opinion as to her right to support under such contract.

The order should be modified in accordance with this opinion and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, ILubbs and Crouch, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.