Matter of Marcus v. Cohen
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Peel (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1934)
- Rosett v. Heffernan (New York Supreme Court 1946)
- In re Schwamm (New York Supreme Court 1938)
- Matter of Straus (N.Y. 1934)
- Matter of Peel v. Cohen (N.Y. 1934)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The order below is affirmed, without costs. The court, however, does not approve of the statement in the opinion of the Appellate Division that the executive committee is given no authority under the Election Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 17) to determine which of conflicting valid petitions should be recognized, if such statement is to be construed as holding that the action of the executive committee is to be given no weight in determining the question. (Matter of Trosk v. Cohen, 262 N. Y. 430.)
. The order should be affirmed, without costs.
Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.