New York Court of Appeals, 1934

Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank

Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 13, 1934
191 N.E. 518; 264 N.Y. 467; 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1520 (North Eastern Reporter)

Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs. The effect of the ex parte order at Special Term was merely to create a notation on the record of valid action taken by the Federal court. First question certified in the affirmative. Second question certified not answered. No opinion. (See 264 N. Y. 670.)

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.