Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank
Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank
191 N.E. 518; 264 N.Y. 467; 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1520
(North Eastern Reporter)
Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs. The effect of the ex parte order at Special Term was merely to create a notation on the record of valid action taken by the Federal court. First question certified in the affirmative. Second question certified not answered. No opinion. (See 264 N. Y. 670.)
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.