Goldberg-Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
Goldberg-Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
195 N.E. 149; 266 N.Y. 451; 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 947
(North Eastern Reporter)
Goldberg-Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
Opinion of the Court
The judgment appealed from by the defendant should be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts, on the authority of Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assur. Society, decided herewith (266 N. Y. 71). The judgment appealed from by the plaintiff should be affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of that case, without discussing the question of sealed instruments, it being unnecessary. (See 266 N. Y. 615.)
Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.