New York Court of Appeals, 1935

Arnold v. Bertolini, Tinker

Arnold v. Bertolini, Tinker
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 13, 1935 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
199 N.E. 692; 269 N.Y. 603; 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 891 (North Eastern Reporter)

Arnold v. Bertolini, Tinker

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be modified to the extent of requiring Kate Darling Bertolini to deposit additional securities sufficient to yield sixty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the deficiency in income of the Annie R. Tinker obligation, and to pay sixty-five per cent of *606 fifty per cent of the arrears in income arising under that obligation and the Annie R. Tinker Memorial Home is required to deposit additional securities sufficient to yield thirty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the deficiency in income and to pay thirty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the arrears in income.

The judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term should be modified in accordance with this opinion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. (See 269 N. Y. 676.)

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Loughran, and Finch, JJ., concur. Crouch, J., not sitting.

Judgment accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.