New York Court of Appeals, 1935

Treacy v. Melrose Paper Stock Co.

Treacy v. Melrose Paper Stock Co.
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 19, 1935 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
199 N.E. 40; 269 N.Y. 155; 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 799 (North Eastern Reporter)
Treacy v. Melrose Paper Stock Co.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The facts shown by defendant were sufficient to warrant trial of the issues raised by the counterclaims pleaded in the answer. Judgment was sought by defendant for a sum in excess of its admitted indebtedness to the corporation of which plaintiff is receiver. Thus the effect of section 176 of the General Corporation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 23) was a question not presented. On this record plaintiff was not entitled to any summary judgment.

The judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term should be reversed and the motion denied, with costs in all courts to the defendant-appellant.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Lough-ran, JJ., concur; Crouch and Finch, JJ., not sitting.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.