New York Court of Appeals, 1935

In re the Accounting of Cornell

In re the Accounting of Cornell
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 12, 1935
195 N.E. 229; 266 N.Y. 620; 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1499 (North Eastern Reporter)
In re the Accounting of Cornell

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs payable out of the fund, and question certified answered in the affirmative. _No opinion.

*622 Concur: Crane, Ch, J,, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Lqughran and Finch, JJ, Crouch, J., dissents on the ground that the burden of proof rested upon the objecting creditor and that he has failed to sustain it either under the language of the policy or under the language of the application.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.