New York Court of Appeals, 1936

Matter of City of N.Y. (Jamaica Bay)

Matter of City of N.Y. (Jamaica Bay)
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 24, 1936 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
5 N.E.2d 191; 272 N.Y. 180; 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 888 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Matter of City of N.Y. (Jamaica Bay)

Opinion of the Court

*183 Per Curiam.

A single question of power in the Supreme Court is involved in the certified question.

Upon this record we find no abuse (as matter of law) of the discretionary power of the Supreme Court. (Hatch v. Central Nat. Bank, 78 N. Y. 487, 489; Matter of Tilden, 98 N. Y. 434, 439; Ladd v. Stevenson, 112 N. Y. 325.) This leads to an affirmance.

We leave the merits to be determined upon the new trial which has been granted.

The order should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Pinch, JJ., concur; Crane, Ch. J., taldng no part.

Order affirmed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.