New York Court of Appeals, 1936

City of New York v. Flatto

City of New York v. Flatto
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 5, 1936
3 N.E.2d 473; 271 N.Y. 662; 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1382 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

City of New York v. Flatto

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by providing that the defendant Flatto have costs in this court and in the Appellate Division against the defendant Kittanning Sales Company, Inc. (See 271 N. Y. 244.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.