New York Court of Appeals, 1936

People v. Scata, Bolognia, Didonne, Zizzo, Kimmel

People v. Scata, Bolognia, Didonne, Zizzo, Kimmel
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 17, 1936
5 N.E.2d 352; 272 N.Y. 602; 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1093 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

People v. Scata, Bolognia, Didonne, Zizzo, Kimmel

Opinion of the Court

As to each defendant, judgment of conviction affirmed. The error in the judge’s charge as to the effect of a promise by the Assistant District Attorney did not in our opinion affect the substantial right of the defendants. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Finch, JJ. Dissenting as to defendants Kimmel, Bruno and Zizzo; Lehman and Loughran, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.