New York Court of Appeals, 1936

Honeyman v. Hanan

Honeyman v. Hanan
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 5, 1936
3 N.E.2d 474; 271 N.Y. 662; 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1383 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Honeyman v. Hanan

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: “A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon by this court. The plaintiff contended that chapter 794 of the Laws of the State of New York, enacted in 1933, as amended (Sections 1083-a and 1083-b of Civil Practice Act), impair the obligations of contracts, and thus violate article 1, section 10, of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that such laws do not violate said provision of article 1, section 10, of the Constitution of the United States.” (See 271 N. Y. 664.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.