Goldstein v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Goldstein v. Connecticut General Life Insurance, 7 N.E.2d 700 (N.Y. 1937)
273 N.Y. 578; 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1308
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
Goldstein v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
Opinion of the Court
The evidence shows that the insured was permanently and totally disabled as defined in the policies. It is, therefore, unnecessary to determine whether the definition formulated by the courts below accurately explained the language of the policies.
The judgments should be affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.
Judgments affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Abraham Goldstein, Respondent, v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, Appellant; Abraham Goldstein, Respondent, v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Appellant; Abraham Goldstein, Respondent, v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Company, Appellant
- Cited By
- 11 cases
- Status
- Published