New York Court of Appeals, 1937

Goldstein v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

Goldstein v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 9, 1937 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
7 N.E.2d 700; 273 N.Y. 578; 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1308 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Goldstein v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

Opinion of the Court

*580 Per Curiam.

The evidence shows that the insured was permanently and totally disabled as defined in the policies. It is, therefore, unnecessary to determine whether the definition formulated by the courts below accurately explained the language of the policies.

The judgments should be affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.

Judgments affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.