Goldstein v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
Goldstein v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
7 N.E.2d 700; 273 N.Y. 578; 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1308
(North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Goldstein v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
Opinion of the Court
The evidence shows that the insured was permanently and totally disabled as defined in the policies. It is, therefore, unnecessary to determine whether the definition formulated by the courts below accurately explained the language of the policies.
The judgments should be affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.
Judgments affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.