New York Court of Appeals, 1937

Lowe v. Sheldon

Lowe v. Sheldon
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 16, 1937 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
11 N.E.2d 329; 276 N.Y. 1; 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1024 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Lowe v. Sheldon

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We are in agreement with the Appellate Division in the conclusion which it reached. We are of the opinion, however, that the amendment of section 139 of the Tax Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 60), under the facts of this case, effected a mere change of procedure and was, therefore, constitutional even between private parties. (Cf. Curtis v. Whitney, 80 U. S. 68; Conley v. Barton, 260 U. S. 677.)

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.