People v. Ring
People v. Ring
16 N.E.2d 386; 278 N.Y. 413; 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1317
(North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
People v. Ring
Opinion of the Court
The judgment should be affirmed. In this case there is proof, lacking in People v. Berman (278 N. Y. 408), decided herewith, of a delivery even though insufficient to pass title.
The judgment should be affirmed.
Lehman, O’Bbien, Hubbs, Loughban and Finch, JJ., concur; Rippey, J., dissents; Crane, Ch. J., taking no part.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.