New York Court of Appeals, 1938

People v. Ring

People v. Ring
New York Court of Appeals · Decided July 7, 1938 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
16 N.E.2d 386; 278 N.Y. 413; 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1317 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

People v. Ring

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed. In this case there is proof, lacking in People v. Berman (278 N. Y. 408), decided herewith, of a delivery even though insufficient to pass title.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Lehman, O’Bbien, Hubbs, Loughban and Finch, JJ., concur; Rippey, J., dissents; Crane, Ch. J., taking no part.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.