Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc., 14 N.E.2d 802 (N.Y. 1938)
277 N.Y. 483; 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1009
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
We are of opinion that interest on the verdict should be added from the time the damage accrued. (See Weprin & Glass Building Corp. v. Rosoff Subway Constr. Co., 269 N. Y. 672.)
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Pinch and Rippey, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Florence B. Sciaky, Appellant, v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc., Respondent, Impleaded With Another
- Cited By
- 9 cases
- Status
- Published