New York Court of Appeals, 1938

Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals · Decided April 12, 1938 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>

14 N.E.2d 802; 277 N.Y. 483; 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1009 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that interest on the verdict should be added from the time the damage accrued. (See Weprin & Glass Building Corp. v. Rosoff Subway Constr. Co., 269 N. Y. 672.)

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Pinch and Rippey, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.