Schlacter v. Dowling
Schlacter v. Dowling
28 N.E.2d 724; 283 N.Y. 721; 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1155
(North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Schlacter v. Dowling
Opinion of the Court
*722 Judgment affirmed, with costs. The plaintiff having conceded the correctness of the report of the weather bureau, there was no substantial evidence that the water upon the subway platform was the cause, as plaintiff claimed, of the occurrence which resulted in the death of the intestate. No opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ. Rippey, J., dissents on the ground a question of fact was presented.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.