Hastings v. H.M. Byllesby and Company, Rosen

New York Court of Appeals October 16, 1941

Hastings v. H.M. Byllesby and Company, Rosen, 37 N.E.2d 145 (N.Y. 1941)

286 N.Y. 705; 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2268

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. The only question presented upon this appeal was the correctness of the order granting the motion to dismiss under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. ■ (See 286 N. Y. 468.)

Reference

Full Case Name: Daniel O. Hastings, as Trustee of Standard Gas and Electric Company, Appellant, v. H. M. Byllesby and Company Et Al., Defendants, and Walter T. Rosen Et Al., Copartners Under the Firm Name of Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co., Et Al., Respondents
Status: Published