Hastings v. H.M. Byllesby and Company, Rosen
Hastings v. H.M. Byllesby and Company, Rosen
37 N.E.2d 145; 286 N.Y. 705; 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2268
(North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Hastings v. H.M. Byllesby and Company, Rosen
Opinion of the Court
Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. The only question presented upon this appeal was the correctness of the order granting the motion to dismiss under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. ■ (See 286 N. Y. 468.)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.