Boudin v. Clarren
Boudin v. Clarren
46 N.E.2d 346; 289 N.Y. 724; 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1293
(North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Boudin v. Clarren
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Ch. J., on the ground that the appellant is entitled to a trial of the question whether the contract was obtained by fraud, and a trial may not be denied to her even assuming that her affidavits show there is no substantial ground for her claim.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.