New York Court of Appeals, 1943

People v. Elling

People v. Elling
New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 14, 1943 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
46 N.E.2d 501; 289 N.Y. 419; 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1164 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
People v. Elling

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The unquestioned evidence is that the defendant Elling shot Skaritza for a reason personal to Elling and unrelated to the robbery and that the defendant Bender tried to prevent the act.

As to the defendant Bender the judgment, so far as appealed from, should be reversed and the second count of the indictment dismissed.

As to the defendant Elling, the judgment of conviction should be affirmed.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.