Matter of Crawford v. Cohen
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Lehrer v. Cavallo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Browning v. Coston (New York Supreme Court 1968)
- Marrin v. Phillips (New York Supreme Court 1968)
- Ryan v. Grimm (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1964)
- Branagan v. Todd (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1963)
- McGuinness v. DeSapio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1959)
- Battipaglia v. Executive Committee of the Democratic County Committee (New York Supreme Court 1959)
- In re Branch (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1950)
- Blaikie v. Knott (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1950)
- Broderick v. Knott (New York Supreme Court 1949)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Section 330, subdivision 2, of the Election Law gives the Supreme Court summary jurisdiction in a proper case to order a reconvening of an organization meeting of the county committee of a political party. So much of the order here appealed from as orders the county committee meeting reconvened, is justified by the proof that many of the committeemen who attended at the place chosen for the first meeting could not be accommodated there, and the proof that for that reason *103 a determination as to the result of the balloting was impossible. The Appellate Division under the circumstances of this case properly refused to determine the disputed questions of fact as to other alleged irregularities. The other directions in the Appellate Division order do not seriously curtail the rights of any party and so do not require our attention. No other question survives in this court.
The order should be affirmed, without costs.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting). I dissent and vote to reverse the orders appealed from and to dismiss the petition on the ground that the Election Law confers no jurisdiction upon the Supreme Court to reconvene a meeting of the county committee duly called and conducted in accordance with section 15 of the Election Law and the rules of the party.
The field within which the plenary powers of the court may be exercised is limited to the matters specified in section 330 of the Election Law (Matter of Holley [Rittenberg], 268 N. Y. 484, 487). Subdivision 2 of that section limits the power of the court to act summarily as to “ The nomination of any candidate, or his election to any party position, * * By the Legislature alone may such summary powers as are here sought to be invoked be extended (Matter of Hogan v. Supreme Court, 281 N. Y. 572, 576).
Lehman, Ch. J., Loitghran, Lewis, Conwat, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; Rippet, J., dissents, in opinion.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.