New York Court of Appeals, 1943

Matter of Bailey v. Bailey

Matter of Bailey v. Bailey
New York Court of Appeals · Decided July 20, 1943
50 N.E.2d 653; 291 N.Y. 534; 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1692 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Spencer Pinkham, Henry F. Holthusen and Lawrence S. Pratt for appellants in first above-entitled proceeding. David Paine, George Koegler and Francis D. Kalosky for appellants in second above-entitled proceeding. Frederick E. Crane, Arthur Garfield Hayes, John Schulman and Morris Shilensky for respondent.

Matter of Bailey v. Bailey

Opinion of the Court

Orders affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the final judgment within the meaning of the statute had been entered before the date when the statute went into effect. We pass on no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ. Taking no part: Lewis, J.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.