New York Court of Appeals, 1943

Rochester v. Bergen

Rochester v. Bergen
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 14, 1943 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
51 N.E.2d 933; 291 N.Y. 656; 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1754 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Rochester v. Bergen

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Paragraph 3 of the agreement is invalid. Paragraph 2 is inseparable from paragraph 3 and falls with it. There has been no refusal or failure to perform any other provision of the agreement. The judgment appealed from denying specific performance and dismissing the complaint is therefore affirmed, with costs.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.