New York Court of Appeals, 1943

Dinny & Robbins, Inc. v. Davis

Dinny & Robbins, Inc. v. Davis
New York Court of Appeals · Decided April 15, 1943
290 N.Y. 745; 49 N.E.2d 1011; 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1364

Dinny & Robbins, Inc. v. Davis

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: A question under the Constitution of the United States was presented and necessarily passed upon. The respondents contended that the judgment of the Trial Court, which granted the injunctive relief against the respond *746 ents, violated the constitutional rights of the respondents under ■ the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that said judgment did not violate the constitutional rights of the respondents under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. (See 290 N. Y. 101.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.