People v. Cummings, Sharpe, Accobacco, Kligerman

New York Court of Appeals
People v. Cummings, Sharpe, Accobacco, Kligerman, 59 N.E.2d 437 (N.Y. 1944)
293 N.Y. 841; 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2260
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>

People v. Cummings, Sharpe, Accobacco, Kligerman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon the record before us we conclude that the trial court erred when it charged as a matter of law that the witnesses Kivowitz and Arnold were not accomplices of the defendants in the crime of concealing and withholding stolen property in' New York County. That inquiry, we think, was one of fact for the jury. The judgments should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughkan, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Reference

Full Case Name
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Cummings, John Sharpe, Dominick Accobacco and Charles Kligerman, Appellants
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published