New York Court of Appeals, 1944

People v. Schulz

People v. Schulz
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 16, 1944 · Conway
59 N.E.2d 175; 293 N.Y. 805; 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2232 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

People v. Schulz

Opinion of the Court

Order of Appellate Division reversed and judgment of Court of Special Sessions affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, LEWIS, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ.

RIPPEY and CONWAY, JJ., dissent upon the ground that there is no prohibition, in the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, of the act charged against the defendant and that such prohibition may not be implied. (People v. Wallace Company, 282 N.Y. 417, 419;People v. Nelson, 153 N.Y. 90, 94; People v. Weinstock,193 N.Y. 481, 485.)

Opinion of the Court

Order of Appellate Division reversed and judgment of Court of Special Sessions affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Lewis, Desmond and Thaoheb, JJ.

Dissenting Opinion

Rippey and Conway, JJ.,

dissent upon the ground that there is no prohibition, in the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, of the act charged against the defendant and that such prohibition may not he implied. (People v. Wallace & Company, 282 N. Y. 417, 419; People v. Nelson, 153 N. Y. 90, 94; People v. Weinstock 193 N. Y. 481, 485.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.