New York Court of Appeals, 1944

In re the Will of Blumenthal

New York Court of Appeals · Decided July 19, 1944

56 N.E.2d 588; 293 N.Y. 707; 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2131 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

25 later published cases cite this decision.

In re the Construction of the Will of Mattes (New York Surrogate's Court 1954)
In re Estate of Detlefs (Neb. 1988)
Giles v. Bruun (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
Beatty v. Cake (Or. 1965)
Buckhantz v. Davidson (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)
In re the Estate of Hewlett (New York Surrogate's Court 1974)
INDUSTRIAL NATIONAL BANK OF RHODE ISLAND v. Lance (R.I. 1972)
In re the Estate of Tropp (New York Surrogate's Court 1971)
In re the Estate of von Echt (New York Surrogate's Court 1963)
In re the Construction of the Will of Shubert (N.Y. 1962)
In re the Estate of Cohen (New York Surrogate's Court 1961)
In re the Construction of the Will of Heit (New York Surrogate's Court 1960)
In re the Accounting of Smithers (New York Surrogate's Court 1959)
In re the Accounting of Smith (New York Surrogate's Court 1959)
In re the Estate of Bros (New York Surrogate's Court 1958)
In re the Estate of King (New York Surrogate's Court 1957)
In re the Estate of Coulter (New York Surrogate's Court 1957)
In re the Construction of the Will of Slade (New York Surrogate's Court 1956)
In re the Estate of Hoffman (New York Surrogate's Court 1954)
In re the Accounting of Gross (New York Surrogate's Court 1953)
In re the Accounting of McKeon (New York Surrogate's Court 1953)
In re the Estate of Pratt (New York Surrogate's Court 1953)
Industrial Trust Co. v. Budlong (R.I. 1950)
In re Harris (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1950)
In re the Estate of Bayne (New York Surrogate's Court 1950)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately, payable out of the estate. No opinion.

*709 Concur: Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ. Lehman, Ch. J., dissents only in respect to that part of the decree which provides that tax credits- should not be apportioned solely to the donees, but should be deducted from the total amount of the Federal estate tax and apportioned to all of the persons sharing by any form of the transfer.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.