New York Court of Appeals, 1944

In Re the Claim of Goldstein

In Re the Claim of Goldstein
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 30, 1944
60 N.E.2d 132; 293 N.Y. 927; 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2333 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

In Re the Claim of Goldstein

Opinion of the Court

Order of Appellate Division reversed, with costs in this court, and decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed upon the sole ground, and as a matter of law, that Monday, January 11, 1943, the date on which appellant concededly reported, was a proper date for such reporting, under Rule jU.I' 18 — 41, as contended in his behalf by his counsel and as conceded by the Attorney-General in behalf of the Commis - sioneir, who consents to this disposition of the case. We pass on nd other question. Those which were considered below were in fact not presented by the record and cannot be considered here. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thaoher, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.