People v. Rudish
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Aranda (Cal. 1965)
- Stein v. New York (Supreme Court of the United States 1953)
- People v. Wheatman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1970)
- People v. Burd (N.Y. 1968)
- People v. Burd (N.Y. 1968)
- People v. Cender (N.Y. 1966)
- People v. Donovan (N.Y. 1963)
- People v. Waterman (N.Y. 1961)
- People v. Caminito (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1957)
- People v. Abel (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1948)
- People v. Indovino (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1945)
- People v. Indovino (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1945)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Upon this reargument we assume that the evidence against Eudish was sufficient and that as to him no error of law was committed upon the trial. Nevertheless, since the Supreme Court of the United States directed a new trial as to Malinski because one of his confessions was inadmissible, the defendant Eudish should, in the interest of justice, receive a new trial with that confession excluded.
The judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial ordered-
Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Desmond, Thacher and Dye, JJ., concur; Lewis and Conway, JJ., dissent on the ground that the decision on this reargument should await the retrial of People v. Malinski.
Judgment of conviction reversed, etc.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.