Canfield v. Moreschi

New York Court of Appeals
Canfield v. Moreschi, 64 N.E.2d 177 (N.Y. 1945)
294 N.Y. 632
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>

Canfield v. Moreschi

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The limited injunction here granted against defendant International Union was appropriate and valid a procedural device for furnishing adequate protection to plaintiffs. We affirm the judgment, as against defendant International Union, on that sole ground. So doing, we find it unnecessary to pass, and do not in any way pass, on the correctness of any of the findings of fact or conclusions of law which purport to decide, or imply, that defendant International Union, or its members (other than its International officers) are responsible or liable for any of the wrongs committed against plaintiffs by the other defendants.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher and Dye, JJ., concur; Lehman, Ch. J., deceased.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Kenneth Canfield, Individually and as President of Rock Drilling, Etc., Local Union No. 17, Et Al., Respondents, v. Joseph v. Moreschi, Individually and as President of International Hod Carriers’, Building and Common Laborers’ Union of America, Et Al., Defendants, and James Bove, Individually and as Vice-President of International Hod Carriers’, Building and Common Laborers’ Union of America, Et Al., Appellants
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published