Matter of Cook v. New York Central Railroad Company

New York Court of Appeals
Matter of Cook v. New York Central Railroad Company, 68 N.E.2d 872 (N.Y. 1946)
296 N.Y. 576; 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1171
Fuld

Matter of Cook v. New York Central Railroad Company

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. FULD, J., dissents on the ground that the voluntary and gratuitous payment of drug or medical bills is not "payment * * * of compensation previously awarded" within the meaning of section 25-a of the Workmen's Compensation Law. Taking no part: DYE, J.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: . Loughran, Oh. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.

Dissenting Opinion

Fuld, J.,

dissents on the ground that the voluntary and gratuitous payment of drug or medical bills is not “ payment * * * of compensation previously awarded ” within the meaning of section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Taking no part: Dye, J.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of the Claim of Luther E. Cook, Respondent, Against New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board Et Al., Respondents
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published