Hartzberg v. New York Central Railroad Company
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Slifkin (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 1961)
- Bolton v. Ziegler (District Court, N.D. Iowa 1953)
- Lichten v. Eastern Airlines, Inc (2d Cir. 1951)
- Lichten v. Eastern Airlines, Inc. (2d Cir. 1951)
- Lichten v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1949)
- Margolis v. Greyhound Eastern Greyhound Lines (Civil Court of the City of New York 1972)
- Chris v. Greyhound Bus Lines (Civil Court of the City of New York 1968)
- Beaumont v. Pennsylvania Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1954)
- Booxbaum v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1947)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Upon this appeal, questions of the application and interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act and the Carmack and Cummins Amendments thereto were presented and necessarily passed upon. The appellants contended: that the respondent’s liability in this cause was governed by the prevailing Michigan Law and not by the Interstate Commerce Act and such amendments and, further, that the attempted limitation of liability of the respondent was invalid and inapplicable under the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended, because no choice of rates was afforded to the appellants -and because no opportunity to declare value was accorded to appellants prior to checking.' The court held to the contrary. No opinion.
Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb, Dye and Medalie, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.