Haines v. Milbank
Haines v. Milbank
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lotjghban, Ch. J., Conway, Thacheb and Ftjld, JJ.;
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., CONWAY, THACHER and FULD, JJ.; DESMOND and DYE, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum: The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted. Assuming, without deciding, plaintiff was bound, on the trial of this case, to make out a prima facie showing that the glass came from a particular window in the Chanin Building, we think the testimony justified an inference to that effect. Taking no part, LEWIS, J. *Page 814
Dissenting Opinion
dissent in the following memorandum: The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted. Assuming, without deciding, plaintiff was bound, on the trial of this ease, to make out a prima facie showing that the glass came from a particular window in the Chanin Building, we think the testimony justified an inference to that effect. Taking no part, Lewis, J.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Isabel S. Haines, Appellant, v. Albert G. Milbank Et Al., Copartners Practicing Law Under the Firm Name of Milbank, Tweed & Hope, Respondents
- Status
- Published