Imperatrice v. Imperatrice
New York Court of Appeals
Imperatrice v. Imperatrice, 81 N.E.2d 95 (N.Y. 1948)
298 N.Y. 549
CoNway, DesmoNd, Dye, Fuld, Lewis, LoughraN, Thacher
Imperatrice v. Imperatrice
Opinion of the Court
Since the first cause of action, sounding in equity, is valid and since defendants’ motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice seeks dismissal of the entire complaint, the motion was properly denied. (See Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co., 296 N. Y. 79, 84; Eidlitz v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc., 239 App. Div. 483, 486; Fusco v. Brooks, 263 App. Div. 845.) We neither consider nor pass upon the sufficiency of the other causes of action,' nor the nature of the judgment to which plaintiff may be entitled.
The order should be affirmed, costs. The question certified should be answered in the affirmative.
Order affirmed, etc.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Anna Imperatrice, Respondent, v. Antonio Imperatrice Et Al., Appellants, Et Al., Defendants
- Cited By
- 16 cases
- Status
- Published