People v. Fanning

New York Court of Appeals
People v. Fanning, 89 N.E.2d 881 (N.Y. 1949)
300 N.Y. 593; 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1453
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>

People v. Fanning

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s petition does not sufficiently allege a case of fraudulent use of perjured testimony by the prosecuting attorney to warrant relief by a coram nobis proceeding. The order should be affirmed.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed. [See 300 N. Y. 677.]

Reference

Full Case Name
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Fanning, Appellant
Cited By
27 cases
Status
Published