People v. Fanning
People v. Fanning
89 N.E.2d 881; 300 N.Y. 593; 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1453
(North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
People v. Fanning
Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s petition does not sufficiently allege a case of fraudulent use of perjured testimony by the prosecuting attorney to warrant relief by a coram nobis proceeding. The order should be affirmed.
Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed. [See 300 N. Y. 677.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.