New York Court of Appeals, 1949

People v. Fanning

People v. Fanning
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 29, 1949 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
89 N.E.2d 881; 300 N.Y. 593; 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1453 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
People v. Fanning

Cases that cite this one

25 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s petition does not sufficiently allege a case of fraudulent use of perjured testimony by the prosecuting attorney to warrant relief by a coram nobis proceeding. The order should be affirmed.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed. [See 300 N. Y. 677.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.