New York Court of Appeals, 1949

People v. Fanning

People v. Fanning
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 29, 1949 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
89 N.E.2d 881; 300 N.Y. 593; 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1453 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

People v. Fanning

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s petition does not sufficiently allege a case of fraudulent use of perjured testimony by the prosecuting attorney to warrant relief by a coram nobis proceeding. The order should be affirmed.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed. [See 300 N. Y. 677.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.