New York Court of Appeals, 1949

People v. Dunn, Gentile

New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 24, 1949 · Loughban, Lewis, Conway, Fuld, Desmond, Dye

84 N.E.2d 635; 298 N.Y. 865 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

People v. Dunn, Gentile (N.Y. 1949)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Upon reargument of appeals by appellants John M. Dunn and Daniel Gentile: Judgments of conviction affirmed. No opinion.

Concur: LoughbaN, Ch. J., Lewis, CoNway and Fuld, JJ. DesmoNd and Dye, JJ., dissent, and vote to reverse and order a new trial on the ground that the newly discovered evidence could well change the result if presented to a jury and, accordingly, should he so presented. [See 298 N. Y. 564, 706, 929.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.